Influencing Factors and Promotion Strategies of Knowledge Sharing in Research Teams
Innovative Organizational Design
PDF

Keywords

knowledge sharing; research teams; multi-level framework; influencing factors; promotion strategies

Abstract

This study investigates knowledge sharing among research teams within a four-level framework of factors affecting and encouraging knowledge sharing. Drawn from social exchange theory, theory of planned behavior, and knowledge management theory, the analysis assesses factors of influence at four levels: individual (competence, motivation, perception), team (trust, psychological safety, leadership), organizational (policies, culture, incentives), and technological (integration, tools, platforms). Concurrent strategies are defined at all levels, with their interplay as the focus. Implications are that successful knowledge sharing calls for systematic intervention of all levels simultaneously, not interventions in discrete fashion. Technology, lacking social and cultural roots, cannot function, and team dynamics must have organizational scaffolding for long-term sustainability. Within areas of conceptual orientation as a paradigm, this research neither empirically investigates nor considers differences between disciplines that uncover lines of further research.

https://doi.org/10.63808/iod.v2i1.241
PDF

References

[1] Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961

[2] Baxter, H., Bearne, L., Chappell, L. C., Fong, S. O., Singh, S. J., Wheatley, A., Wilson, P. M., Barker, F., & Thomas, J. (2024). The effectiveness of knowledge-sharing techniques and approaches in research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR): A systematic review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 22(1), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01127-5

[3] Chen, K., Huo, W., Yao, Z., & Huang, J. (2020). Why knowledge sharing in scientific research teams is difficult to sustain: An interpretation from the interactive perspective of knowledge hiding behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 537833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537833

[4] Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134

[5] Dorta-Afonso, D., Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J. L., Díaz-Díaz, N. L., & De Saá-Pérez, P. (2024). Knowledge-oriented leadership and learning in academic research teams. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(7), 855–875. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2022-0073

[6] Esmaeili, A., Gomes, J., & Sarkis, J. (2024). Methods and technologies for supporting knowledge sharing within learning communities: A systematic literature review. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010017

[7] Hao, Q., Shi, Y., & Yang, W. (2022). How trust in coworkers fosters knowledge sharing in virtual teams? A multilevel moderated mediation model of psychological safety, team virtuality, and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 899142. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899142

[8] Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136

[9] Manaseer, S., Alawneh, A. R., & Asoudi, D. (2022). Social exchange theory and theory of reasoned action affecting knowledge sharing: A case from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Information Studies & Technology, 2022(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5339/jist.2022.5

[10] Nahidi, A., Zhou, Q., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Breaking down barriers: Exploring the impact of social capital on knowledge sharing and transfer in the workplace. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 942. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03384-9

[11] Osei-Frimpong, K., Wilson, A., & Lemke, F. (2023). Knowledge sharing in organization: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), Article 2195027. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2195027

[12] Pößneck, J., Kabisch, S., Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., van Oel, C. J., Soliman-Junior, J., Tzortzopoulos, P., & Koolwijk, J. S. J. (2024). Knowledge sharing through scenario development: Experiences of an interdisciplinary and international research project. International Planning Studies, 29(4), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080188241291828

[13] Raziq, M. M., Jabeen, Q., Saleem, S., Shamout, M. D., & Bashir, S. (2024). Organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational performance: A multi-country study. Business Process Management Journal, 30(2), 586–611. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2023-0549

[14] Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001

[15] Yan, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016). Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management, 53(5), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.001

[16] Zhang, Z. (2018). Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: Design of incentives and business processes. Business Process Management Journal, 24(2), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-08-2015-0119

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Ran Li, Rozaini Rosli