Abstract
This paper explores the disruption properties of novel organisational design patterns on resistance to change in intelligent wealth management transformation using a case study research method. The study considers three domestic private banks for 18 months, using semi-structured interviews, focus group, participant observation, and documentary sources to identify resistance dissolution process. The study demonstrates four unique types of resistance, including technological adaptability, organizational inertia, interest pattern adjustment, and cultural cognitive resistance. Our study identifies four organizational design routines: agile architecture makeover, data-driven decison-making mechanism, cross-functional collaborative team assembly and intelligent human resources allocation strategies. The effectiveness of implementation evidences overall performance gains of 65%-89% on different mechanism types, technology-supported mechanisms leading when dealing with digitally mature contexts, while learning-based strategies performing best at the first stages of the transformation. The results suggest that organization design innovation may be applied on context-by-context basis to degrade systemic resistance when working and avoid operational disruption. This study contributes to the theory of organisational design with empirical evidence on the effectiveness of structural innovation and practical models for wealth management firms in dealing with challenges related to digital transformation.
References
[1] Handoko, I., & Tjaturpriono, H. A. (2023). The evolution of organizational design: the case of digital startups. International Journal of Emerging Markets, ahead-of-print.
[2] Wu, L., Sun, L., Chang, Q., Zhang, D., & Qi, P. (2024). The impact of digital capabilities and dynamic capabilities on business model innovation: The moderating effect of organizational inertia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 910.
[3] Rehman, N., Mahmood, A., Ibtasam, M., Murtaza, S. A., Iqbal, N., & Molnár, E. (2021). The psychology of resistance to change: The antidotal effect of organizational justice, support and leader-member exchange. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 678952.
[4] Valtonen, A., & Holopainen, M. (2025). Mitigating employee resistance and achieving well-being in digital transformation. Information Technology & People, ahead-of-print.
[5] Liu, Q., et al. (2024). Moving beyond conventional resistance and resistors: An integrative review of employee resistance to digital transformation. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2442550.
[6] Kretschmer, T., & Khashabi, P. (2020). Digital transformation and organization design: An integrated approach. California Management Review, 62(4), 86-104.
[7] Leading in the Digital Age Research Group. (2025). Leading in the digital age: The role of leadership in organizational digital transformation. Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 43.
[8] Huang, R., et al. (2025). Unraveling the paradoxical effects of digital transformation on organizational resilience: The role of customer and supplier concentrations. Journal of Business Research, 192, 115292.
[9] Deloitte Insights. (2025). Top 10 wealth management industry trends and insights 2025. Capgemini Research Institute.
[10] Bardhan, A., et al. (2022). Revisiting resistance to change and how to manage it: What has been learned and what organizations need to do. Business Horizons, 65(6), 713-726.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Innovative Organizational Design