Moral Development in University Education: Integrity Awareness, Social Responsibility, and Moral Behavioral Intention among Chinese University Students

Moral Development in University Education: Integrity Awareness, Social Responsibility, and Moral Behavioral Intention among Chinese University Students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63808/isgr.v2i3.396

Keywords:

Integrity awareness, Social responsibility, Moral behavioral intention, Moral development, Chinese university students, Higher education management

Abstract

This study examines how integrity awareness, social responsibility, and moral behavioral intention are related in the moral development of Chinese university students. Although universities commonly emphasize honesty, civic duty, and ethical conduct, students may not always translate moral understanding into readiness to act when they face academic pressure, peer influence, interpersonal concerns, or uncertainty about institutional support. Using a mixed-methods explanatory design, the study drew on survey data from 500 undergraduates in five universities in Eastern China and semi-structured interviews with 18 students. The quantitative findings indicate that integrity awareness positively predicts moral behavioral intention both directly and indirectly through social responsibility. The qualitative evidence further shows that peer norms, academic competition, interpersonal relations, institutional responsiveness, and social media-related academic practices influence whether students feel able to act on moral judgments. The study contributes to higher education management by showing that moral development depends not only on students’ moral cognition but also on institutional conditions that activate responsibility and support ethical action. The findings suggest that universities should combine integrity governance, responsibility-based curriculum design, faculty modeling, experiential learning, transparent procedures, and digital ethics guidance to reduce the gap between moral knowledge and ethical intention.

References

[1] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

[2] Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3

[3] Bretag, T. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of academic integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8

[4] Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

[5] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020, June 1). Guidelines for the construction of curriculum ideology and politics in higher education institutions. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-06/06/content_5517606.htm

[6] Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084

[7] Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350

[8] Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

[9] Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835

[10] Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07

[11] Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Praeger.

[12] Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6

[13] International Commission on the Futures of Education. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722

Downloads

Published

2026-09-29
Loading...