Digital Exclusion and Social Protection Accessibility among Older Adults in China

Digital Exclusion and Social Protection Accessibility among Older Adults in China

Authors

  • Fanqi Wei School of Philosophy and Sociology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63808/grs.v2i1.496

Keywords:

Digital exclusion, Older adults, Social protection, Administrative burden, Accessibility, China

Abstract

China’s social protection system is becoming increasingly digital while its population ages rapidly. By the end of 2025, 323.38 million people were aged 60 years or older, yet the internet-use rate for this group was 53.7%. This integrative narrative review examines how digital exclusion affects older adults’ ability to obtain social protection in China. Rather than proposing an entirely new framework, it integrates a three-level model of digital inequality (access, skills and use, and outcomes) with the administrative-burden framework (learning, compliance, and psychological costs), and applies this synthesis across the full service journey and across five protection programmes whose burden profiles differ in transaction frequency, risk, and exposed groups. The evidence shows that digital barriers can arise at every stage of the service journey, including discovery, authentication, application, receipt, maintenance, and redress. Risks are greatest for the oldest-old, rural residents, people with limited education or income, persons with disability or cognitive decline, and those without reliable assistance. China’s age-friendly policies and continued offline provision are important, but interface adaptation alone cannot resolve fragmented procedures or inaccessible verification. Effective digital social protection requires equivalent channels, simpler documentation, trusted assisted-digital support, safe delegation, interoperable data, and evaluation based on successful benefit receipt rather than online activity.

References

[1] Cao, J., & Ma, L. (2026). Digital transformation, administrative burden, and citizen–state interactions: A case of the old age allowance policy in China. Review of Policy Research, 43(3), e70063. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70063

[2] Chen, T., Shang, T., Yan, R., & He, K. (2026). Does mobile government become an administrative burden for older adults? Aslib Journal of Information Management, 78(2), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2024-0437

[3] China Internet Network Information Center. (2026, February 5). The 57th statistical report on China’s internet development. https://www3.cnnic.cn/n4/2026/0304/c88-11549.html

[4] General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2020, November 24). Implementation plan for effectively addressing difficulties faced by older people in using smart technologies. https://app.www.gov.cn/govdata/gov/202011/24/465255/article.html

[5] Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x

[6] Hu, H., & Xu, W. (2024). Socioeconomic differences in digital inequality among Chinese older adults: Results from a nationally representative sample. PLOS ONE, 19(4), e0300433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300433

[7] Hunsaker, A., & Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937–3954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348

[8] Kutcher, A. M., & LeBaron, V. T. (2022). A simple guide for completing an integrative review using an example article. Journal of Professional Nursing, 40, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.02.004

[9] Li, H., & Kostka, G. (2024). Navigating the digital age: The gray digital divide and digital inclusion in China. Media, Culture & Society, 46(6), 1181–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241229382

[10] Liu, L., Wu, F., Tong, H., Hao, C., & Xie, T. (2021). The digital divide and active aging in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312675

[11] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the People’s Republic of China. (2025, February 11). Opinions on improving the unified national social insurance public service platform. https://www.mohrss.gov.cn/xxgk2020/fdzdgknr/qt/gztz/202503/t20250318_538687.html

[12] Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China. (2020, December 24). Special action plan for age-friendly and accessibility adaptation of internet applications. https://www.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/xgj/wjfb/art/2020/art_18a8b1029f724afc8b31264fcd0f4106.html

[13] Moynihan, D. P., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009

[14] National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2026, February 28). Statistical communiqué of the People’s Republic of China on the 2025 national economic and social development. https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202602/t20260228_1962661.html

[15] National Healthcare Security Administration. (2020, December 29). Implementation opinions on maintaining traditional service methods alongside smart-service innovation and optimizing medical security services. https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2020/12/29/art_37_4226.html

[16] National Healthcare Security Administration. (2026, March 16). 2025 statistical bulletin on the development of medical security. https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2026/3/16/art_7_19918.html

[17] OECD. (2024). Modernising access to social protection: Strategies, technologies and data advances in OECD countries. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/af31746d-en

[18] Ran, X., Chen, G., & Guo, B. (2026). A narrower access gap, yet persistent divides: The digital inequality among China’s urban-rural older adults. BMC Public Health, 26, 1733. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27131-8

[19] State Administration for Market Regulation. (2026, July 16). China issues first national standard for elderly-friendly government service platforms. https://english.samr.gov.cn/News/PressReleases/art/2026/art_92f1041e2b0c465d97a0e116c4e58477.html

[20] Sukhera, J. (2022). Narrative reviews: Flexible, rigorous, and practical. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(4), 414–417. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1

[21] van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (Vol. 10, pp. 29–52). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002

[22] Wu, M., Xue, Y., & Ma, C. (2025). The association between the digital divide and health inequalities among older adults in China: Nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e62645. https://doi.org/10.2196/62645

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16
Loading...