From Communication Traffic to Brand Cognition: The Multilevel Effectiveness of University Brand Communication on Douyin—A Thematic Analysis of Three Types of Universities in Shaanxi Province, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63808/pcm.v2i3.543Keywords:
University brand communication, Douyin short videos, Communication effectiveness, Opinion leadership, Thematic analysisAbstract
Short-video platforms have become an important channel for university brand communication, yet views, likes, and follower counts provide limited explanation of why universities choose particular content, how key individuals participate in information mediation, or what forms of brand cognition audiences ultimately develop. Using three types of universities in Shaanxi Province as comparative contexts, this study employs multi-stakeholder semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis to examine the organisational logic of university brand communication on Douyin, platform adaptation, opinion-leadership mechanisms, the relationship between brand identity and audience brand image, and the ways in which communication effectiveness is assessed. The study included 21 participants, seven from each university, covering five role categories: communication decision-makers, content producers, potential opinion leaders, internal audiences, and external audiences. Interview data were managed using NVivo 14 and analysed through within-case coding and cross-case comparison following Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis procedure, resulting in six shared themes. The findings show that the effectiveness of university brand communication on Douyin is not a single traffic outcome but consists of four interrelated yet non-substitutable levels: platform performance, audience understanding and interaction, alignment with organisational objectives, and long-term brand value. Institutional positioning and organisational governance shape communication objectives and content production, constituting organisational antecedents of effectiveness; platform adaptation requires a balance between visibility and the integrity of brand identity and may lead to brand narrowing; key individuals, including academics, students, and alumni, supplement official communication through professional authority, humanised authenticity, and experiential mediation, constituting an interpersonal mechanism of effectiveness; and partial misalignment between brand identity and audience brand image reveals the complexity of the audience-understanding level. This study argues that university short-video communication should be evaluated through a multilevel effectiveness framework and should develop differentiated communication logics according to institutional positioning, credible communicators, and target-audience cognition.
References
[1] Akbari, D. A., Jastacia, B., Setiawan, E., & Widya Ningsih, D. (2022). The marketing power of TikTok: A content analysis in higher education. Binus Business Review, 13(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v13i2.8014
[2] Boeker, M., & Urman, A. (2022). An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (pp. 2298–2309). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512102
[3] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[4] Guo, X., & Feng, Z. (2024). Identifying university opinion leaders during the global crisis: Information communication on official websites. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1703. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04285-7
[5] Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610669176
[6] Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press.
[7] Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700101
[8] Kethüda, Ö., & Bilgin, Y. (2025). The role of social media marketing activities in converting existing students into university advocates. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 35(3), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2023.2225431
[9] Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
[10] Perera, C. H., Nayak, R., & Nguyen, L. T. V. (2023). The impact of social media marketing and brand credibility on higher education institutes’ brand equity in emerging countries. Journal of Marketing Communications, 29(8), 770–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2022.2086284
[11] Peruta, A., & Shields, A. B. (2017). Social media in higher education: Understanding how colleges and universities use Facebook. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2016.1212451
[12] Peruta, A., & Shields, A. B. (2018). Marketing your university on social media: A content analysis of Facebook post types and formats. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1442896
[13] Sidorenko Bautista, P., Cabrera Méndez, M., & Torrente-Martínez, M.-J. (2024). How do universities communicate on Tik Tok? VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review, 16(4), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v16.5275
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Xin Zhou, Awan Binti Ismail

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.