Silver Generation and Native Generation Z: A Study on Intra-generational Differentiation of Consumption Intention under the Differences in Social Media Usage

Silver Generation and Native Generation Z: A Study on Intra-generational Differentiation of Consumption Intention under the Differences in Social Media Usage

Authors

  • Junfang Xia City Graduate School (CGS), City University Malaysia, Petaling Jaya 46100, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63808/pcm.v2i2.331

Keywords:

intra-generational differentiation, consumption intention, social media usage, silver generation, Generation Z

Abstract

In this study, generation-based differences in consumption intentions are examined among consumers belonging to the Silver Generation (55-70 years old) and the Native Generation Z (18-25 years old). Using the extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) approach in the context of social commerce and integrated TPB-TAM framework for purchase intention in an online environment, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among 280 participants. Based on the results of k-means clustering analysis, three types of consumers were identified among members of the Silver Generation: Digital Adopters, Selective Users, and Digital Observers. In the same way, three consumer types were identified among the Native Generation Z consumers: Social Commerce Enthusiasts, Content Creators, and Passive Consumers. Results of the multiple regression analysis demonstrated that social media usage had a significant impact on consumption intentions (β=0.38, p<0.001, R2=0.31). Also, based on bootstrap mediation analysis, it was found that the role of social influence accounted for 22% of the total impact (indirect effect=0.19, 95% CI [0.11, 0.28]). In addition, digital literacy moderated the relationship between usage and intention only among members of the Silver Generation (β=0.22, p=0.016).

References

[1] Fan X, Meng F, Wang D, Guo Q, Ji Z, Yang L, Ogihara A. Perceptions of traditional Chinese medicine for chronic disease care and prevention: a cross-sectional study of Chinese hospital-based health care professionals. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2018;18:209. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2273-y

[2] Anchal, I., & Tiwary, A. (2025). Generational differences in smartphone purchase behavior: A comparative analysis of social media marketing strategies. Advances in Consumer Research, 2, 3846–3857.

[3] Anter, L., Fischer, M., & Kümpel, A. S. (2025). Older adults’ information use on social media: The role of psychological needs and personality traits. Research on Aging, 47(9–10), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275251341447

[4] Hu, S., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Effects of social media usage on consumers’ purchase intention in social commerce: A cross-cultural empirical analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 837752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837752

[5] Huang, T. (2023). Expanding the UTAUT2 framework to determine the drivers of mobile shopping behaviour among older adults. PLoS ONE, 18(12), e0295581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295581

[6] Leong, L. Y., Hew, T. S., Ooi, K. B., Metri, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Extending the theory of planned behavior in the social commerce context: A meta-analytic SEM (MASEM) approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(5), 1847–1879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10337-7

[7] Nguyen, T. T., Truong, H. T. T., & Le-Anh, T. (2023). Online purchase intention under the integration of theory of planned behavior and technology acceptance model. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231218814. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231218814

[8] Ramírez-Correa, P. E., Arenas-Gaitán, J., Rondán-Cataluña, F. J., & Grandon, E. E. (2023). Adoption of social networking sites among older adults: The role of the technology readiness and the generation to identifying segments. PLoS ONE, 18(4), e0284585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284585

[9] Santosa, A. D., Taufik, N., Prabowo, F. H. E., & Rahmawati, M. (2021). Continuance intention of baby boomer and X generation as new users of digital payment during COVID-19 pandemic using UTAUT2. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 26(4), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-021-00104-1

[10] Thangavel, P., Pathak, P., & Chandra, B. (2022). Consumer decision-making style of gen Z: A generational cohort analysis. Global Business Review, 23(3), 710–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919880128

[11] Theocharis, D., Tsekouropoulos, G., Chatzigeorgiou, C., & Kokkinis, G. (2025). Empirical categorization of factors affecting online consumer behavior of Gen Z regarding newly launched technological products and moderating impact of perceived risk. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030371

[12] Uddin, M. A., Talukder, M. A., Ahmed, M. R., Khraisat, A., Alazab, A., Islam, M. M., & Jibon, F. A. (2024). Data-driven strategies for digital native market segmentation using clustering. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering, 5, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcce.2024.04.002

[13] Wan, L., Lan, Y., Jian, J., & Liu, K. (2025). How social media involvement affect consumer purchase intention on online social networking sites: Examining the mediating role of self-disclosure. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1604727. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1604727

[14] Zahoor, S. Z., & Shah, A. M. (2024). Impact of social media on users’ complex buying behaviour: Analysing the mediating effect of perception and moderating effect of extended social media usage. Management and Labour Studies, 49(1), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X231167315

[15] Zhou, M., Gao, M., & Liang, S. (2024). Exploring the mechanisms driving elderly Fintech engagement: The role of social influence and the elderly’s digital literacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1420147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420147

Downloads

Published

2026-07-09
Loading...