Intellectual Property Protection for Generative AI-Created Works: Challenges and Countermeasures in Administrative Penalty Discretionary Benchmarks

Intellectual Property Protection for Generative AI-Created Works: Challenges and Countermeasures in Administrative Penalty Discretionary Benchmarks

Authors

  • Ziyin Zhou Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63808/lc.v2i1.278

Keywords:

Generative artificial intelligence, Intellectual property protection, Administrative penalties, Discretionary benchmarks

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the intellectual property protection of its creations has become a critical issue, wherein administrative penalty discretionary benchmarks play a pivotal role. Current benchmarks face challenges including ambiguous conceptual definitions, high subjectivity, lack of dynamic adaptability, and insufficient transparency. Drawing upon relevant legal principles and theories, this paper proposes countermeasures such as establishing clear formulation principles, enhancing scientific objectivity, strengthening dynamic adaptability, and improving transparency. These aim to refine administrative penalty discretion benchmarks, thereby providing robust support for the intellectual property protection of generative AI creations and promoting the healthy and orderly development of AI technology.

References

Alhadeff, J., Cuene, C., & Real, D. M. (2024). Limits of algorithmic fair use. Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, 19(1), 1–53.

Beijing Internet Court. (2023). Li v. Liu (Civil Judgment No. 11279 of 2023, First Instance, Civil Division of Beijing Internet Court). China Judgments Online. https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/

Chen, B. (2023). Risk challenges brought by the innovative development of general artificial intelligence and their legal response [In Chinese]. Zhishi Chanquan [Intellectual Property], (8), 53–73.

Feng, X. Q. (2006). The interest balance theory of intellectual property law [In Chinese]. China University of Political Science and Law Press.

Kuang, J. (2020). On the copyright law protection of AI creations [In Chinese]. Zhongguo Chuban [China Publishing Journal], (18), 63–67.

Li, J. Y. (2022). On the legal control of automated administrative punishment [In Chinese] [Doctoral dissertation, Nanchang University].

Li, S. Y., Li, X. Q., Ding, X. Y., Li, W., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Network ideological risks and prevention of Sora-like generative artificial intelligence [In Chinese]. Xinan Minzu Daxue Xuebao (Renwen Shehui Kexue Ban) [Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)], 45(8), 198–206.

Sun, L., & Shen, C. Y. (2023). Empowerment and reconstruction: New paths of animation creation under the generative artificial intelligence wave [In Chinese]. Dianying Pingjie [Movie Review], (20), 6–11.

Tang, Z. Y., & Xie, Y. J. (2024). Copyright infringement risks and governance of data use in generative artificial intelligence [In Chinese]. Zhongguo Chuban [China Publishing Journal], (21), 56–61.

Wang, Q. B., & Weng, M. J. (2023). Practical hidden worries and approach adjustment of intelligent administrative discretion in administrative punishment [In Chinese]. Beijing Xingzheng Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Beijing Administrative College], (3), 98–109.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29
Loading...