Keywords
Abstract
This research investigates the legal concept of parental authority in selected countries as a basis for refining provisions within the Philippine Family Law. Guided by the 1987 Philippine Constitution and the Philippine Family Code, the study examines statutory principles, Supreme Court jurisprudence, and international practices on parental rights and responsibilities. The analysis emphasizes the shared exercise of parental authority, the continued application of the tender-age doctrine, and the necessity for clearer provisions on parental fitness. Comparative insights are drawn from legal systems in Japan, Canada, Norway, the United States, and other jurisdictions to inform policy enhancement. The study concludes with recommendations for legislative amendments that safeguard the welfare of the child while strengthening parental accountability.
References
[1] Abascal Monedero, P. J. (2019). The development of family law: General insight.
[2] Abe, Y. (2011). Children and parents in Japanese law and family.
[3] Alampay, L. P. (2014). Parenting in the Philippines. In H. Selin (Ed.), Parenting across cultures: Childrearing, motherhood and fatherhood in non-Western cultures (pp. 105-121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7503-9_9
[4] Blair, S. L. (2014). Parental involvement and children’s educational performance: A comparison of Filipino and U.S. parents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 45(3), 351–368.
[5] Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Martínez, M. L. (2007). Adolescents as active agents in the socialization process: Legitimacy of parental authority and obligation to obey across adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 30(2), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.03.003
[6] Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Peña-Alampay, L. (2005). Rules, legitimacy of parental authority, and obligation to obey in Chile, the Philippines, and the United States. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2005(108), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.127
[7] Goodall, J., & Vorhaus, J. (2010). Review of best practice in parental engagement. Department for Education.
[8] Lee, E. (2005). Family law and inheritance law in North Korea. Journal of Korean Law, 5, 172.
[9] Rahmawati, D., & Rachmawati, D. (2020). The role of child protection in fulfilling children’s rights: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2020) (pp. 456–461). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201204.078
[10] Sacha, J. J., & Quinn, J. M. (2010). The environment, the airway, and the athlete. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 106(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2010.06.004
[11] Smetana, J. G. (2017). Current research on parenting styles, dimensions, and beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.012
[12] Smetana, J. G., Metzger, A., Gettman, D. C., & Campione-Barr, N. (2006). Disclosure and secrecy in adolescent-parent relationships. Child Development, 77(1), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00865.x
[13] Canada. (1985). Children’s Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-8.3, § parental responsibility.
[14] China, National People’s Congress. (2021). Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China, Article 26.
[15] Norway. (1981). Lov om barn og foreldre (Children Act), Act No. 7 of April 8, 1981, §30. https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1981-04-08-7
[16] Philippines. (1987). Executive Order No. 209: Family Code of the Philippines.
[17] Saskatchewan, Government of. (2023). Bill 137: The Education (Parents’ Bill of Rights) Amendment Act. Retrieved December 3, 2023, from https://www.saskatchewan.ca/government/news-and-media/2023/december/03/bill-137-education-parents-bill-of-rights
[18] Sweden. (1949). Föräldrabalk (Parents Code), SFS 1949:381, Chapters 9-15.
[19] Masbate v. Relucio, G.R. No. 235498 (Supreme Court of the Philippines, July 30, 2018).
[20] Reyes v. Elquiero, G.R. No. 210487 (Supreme Court of the Philippines, September 2, 2020).
[21] Silva v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 114742 (Supreme Court of the Philippines, July 17, 1997).
[22]Philippines, Office of the President. (n.d.). Proposed amendment to Executive Order No. 100. Unpublished executive proposal.
[23]U.S. Supreme Court. (1923-2023). Parental rights doctrine [Jurisprudential synthesis].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Abejuela Armando, Ricamora Maria Sharron, Nuñez Norma, Reynoso Lino