Artificial Intelligence in Investment Banking Risk Management: Applications, Benefits, and Governance Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63808/ihf.v2i4.477Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Investment banking, Risk management, Market risk, Credit risk, Operational risk, Compliance risk, Machine learning, Deep learning, Model risk governance, Explainable AIAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the investment banking landscape and its impact on risk management is undeniable, with the ability to analyze vast volumes of complex and heterogeneous data to make more informed and timely decisions regarding market risk, credit risk, operational risk, and compliance risk. The design of this study is qualitative, descriptive, and secondary data analysis, which is based solely on academic literature, industry reports, and regulatory publications, from which the synthesis of how AI tools are used in the different stages of the risk management process (identification, measurement, monitoring, and mitigation) is taken. Thematic content analysis is applied to identify the key areas of the common applications of AI: short-term market forecasts, AI-enhanced credit scoring, anomaly-based fraud detection, and natural language processing (NLP) for surveillance, and the perceived benefits and implementation challenges. The results show that AI can have a substantial impact on predictive accuracy, early identification of anomalies and unethical activity, operational efficiency, and integration of multiple data sources, which can add to the resilience of banks when implemented in a strong governance structure. Meanwhile, the growing complexity of models, data quality challenges, lack of model explainability, potential model bias, and shifting regulations expectations add to a new layer of model and governance risk that needs to be managed. The study concludes that AI should be considered a useful complementary tool, not a replacement, for the traditional quantitative models and investment bankers' experience, and recommends that investment banks have clear AI strategies, improve model risk management, invest in cross-functional capabilities and integrate ethical and regulatory aspects throughout the AI lifecycle.
References
[1] Ashta, A., & Herrmann, H. (2021). Artificial intelligence and fintech: An overview of opportunities and risks for banking, investments, and microfinance. Strategic Change, 30(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2404
[2] Attipalli, A., Mamidala, J. V., Kurma, J., Enokkaren, S., Kendyala, R., & Bitkuri, V. (2025). Systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques for enhancing financial reporting and regulatory compliance (SSRN Working Paper). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5741343
[3] Bahlool, R., Hewahi, N., & Elmedany, W. (2026). Performance, fairness, and explainability in AI-based credit scoring: A systematic literature review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(2), Article 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19020104
[4] Bank of England. (2024). SS1/23: Model risk management principles for banks. Prudential Regulation Authority. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2023/may/model-risk-management-principles-for-banks
[5] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2024). Regulating AI in the financial sector (FSI Insights No. 63). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights63.htm
[6] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2025). Managing explanations: How regulators can address AI explainability (FSI Occasional Paper No. 24). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/fsipapers24.pdf
[7] Financial Stability Board. (2024). The financial stability implications of artificial intelligence. https://www.fsb.org/2024/11/the-financial-stability-implications-of-artificial-intelligence/
[8] Giudici, P., Centurelli, M., & Turchetta, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence risk measurement. Expert Systems with Applications, 235, Article 121220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121220
[9] Gregory, J. (2012). Counterparty credit risk and credit value adjustment (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118673638
[10] Habbal, A., Ali, M. K., & Abuzaraida, M. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence trust, risk and security management (AI TRiSM): Frameworks, applications, challenges and future research directions. Expert Systems with Applications, 240, Article 122442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122442
[11] Ho, T. S., & Lee, S. B. (2004). The Oxford guide to financial modeling. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195169621.001.0001
[12] Jagirdar, S. S., Gupta, P. K., Jain, S., Vibhu, G., & Sharma, M. (2025). AI-driven innovations in banking analytics and regulatory compliance. In Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics (pp. 15–38). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0209-6.ch002
[13] Lee, J. (2020). Access to finance for artificial intelligence regulation in the financial services industry. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(4), 731–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00200-0
[14] Lu, Y. (2019). Artificial intelligence: A survey on evolution, models, applications and future trends. Journal of Management Analytics, 6(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2019.1570365
[15] Martín-Martín, A., Costas, R., Van Leeuwen, T., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Evidence of open access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: A large-scale analysis. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/k54uv
[16] Namdar, K., Wang, P.-C., Raju, T., Zheng, S., Li, F., & Khan, S. T. (2025). Anti-money laundering machine learning pipelines: A technical analysis on identifying high-risk bank clients with supervised learning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09127
[17] Sarker, I. H. (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Computer Science, 2(3), Article 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x
[18] Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
[19] Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00019-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ratul Hasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.