Abstract
This paper investigates the role of long-term, risk-tolerant patient capital in fostering sustainable growth among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Kyrgyzstan, a transition economy characterized by a dual-policy framework—concurrent membership in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) customs union and a bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with China—alongside significant land fragmentation. By integrating institutional embeddedness theory with resource-based view (RBV) perspectives, we propose two context-specific analytical frameworks: the “dual-policy hub economy” and “land-constrained resource–capital synergy.” Employing firm-level panel data from the National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic (2019–2025), we utilize instrumental variable probit, spatial Durbin model (SDM), and quantile regression methodologies. Findings demonstrate that patient capital exerts a significant positive impact on SME productivity, export performance, and technological upgrading. SMEs located within free trade zones exhibit the most pronounced export performance improvements, while agricultural SMEs, in particular, utilize patient capital to obtain international certifications and mitigate reliance on imported raw materials via a sequential mechanism involving institutional coordination, resource integration, and technological upgrading. This research contributes to institutional embeddedness theory by contextualizing it within Central Asian settings and provides evidence-informed policy recommendations for designing patient capital instruments. Future research could expand the temporal coverage and include cross-country comparative analyses to explore how varying institutional configurations influence the effectiveness of long-term capital.
References
[1] Alimhanova, A. (2022). Patient capital in Central Asia: Challenges and opportunities. Central Asian Journal of Economic Studies, 8(1), 23-41.
[2] Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
[3] Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2023). Financing SMEs in emerging markets: New evidence on gaps and solutions (Policy Research Working Paper No. 10345). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-10345
[4] Eurasian Economic Union. (2024). Eurasian Economic Union trade statistics 2023. EAEU Publications.
[5] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). Kyrgyzstan agricultural census report. FAO.
[6] Jumabekova, A. (2023). Informal finance and SMEs in Kyrgyzstan: A field survey. Kyrgyz Economic Review, 12(3), 45-60.
[7] Kyrgyz State Geodetic Institute. (2023). Enterprise geolocation database 2023. KSGI.
[8] Kurmanalieva, E. (2021). Resource dependence and economic growth in Kyrgyzstan. Post-Communist Economies, 33(5), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1893661
[9] Mavlyanova, M. (2022). Organic transition in Kyrgyz agriculture: The role of long-term finance. Agricultural Economics, 53(3), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12704
[10] National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2025). Financial stability report 2024. NBKR.
[11] Sharshiev, I. (2023). Hub economy and patient capital in Kyrgyzstan’s transit potential. Journal of Eurasian Economics, 14(2), 45-62.
[12] Sultanov, A. (2024). Land fragmentation and agricultural productivity in Kyrgyzstan. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(2), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12555
[13] World Bank. (2022). Kyrgyzstan education sector review. World Bank Group.
[14] World Bank. (2024). Kyrgyz Republic: Small and medium enterprises diagnostic. World Bank Group.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Li Liu, Xin Cui, Kalybek Abdykadyrov

