Keywords
Abstract
Economic inequality weakens social cohesion in three ways: by decreasing interpersonal trust, increasing intergroup animosity, and eroding accepted social norms. Comparative analysis reveals that the magnitude of this negative impact is not uniformly moderated by contextual factors such as social mobility, welfare institution strength, and cultural values. To further strengthen social cohesion, reduce these adverse effects, and build a more resilient social fabric, governments should develop policies that support a society with a high level of social inclusion, social capital, and social diversity.
References
[1] Chauhan, S., Rahman, M. H. U., Jaleel, A., & Patel, R. (2022). Economic inequality in social cohesion among older adults in low- and middle-income countries. Ageing International, 47(2), 206–225.
[2] Cheng, L., Xiao, L., Zhu, X., Li, Z., & Wang, F. (2024). Economic inequality weakens social cohesion: An “interpersonal–intergroup–normative” three-process model. Psychological Science (China), 47(6), 1486.
[3] Foxon, T. J. (2011). A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low-carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2258–2267.
[4] Liu, Y., Hao, D., & Huo, X. (2022). New progress in the economics of carbon neutrality. The Economist (China), 6(5G15), 5.
[5] Lockie, S. (2022). Mainstreaming climate change sociology. Environmental Sociology, 8(1), 1–6.
[6] Lu, Z., & Hu, A. (2021). Building a modern economic system for green, low-carbon and circular development in China: Pathways and practical significance. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 21(6), 35–43.
[7] Pan, D., & Chen, C. (2021). Financial policy and the low-carbon transformation of the economy: A growth-perspective study. Journal of Financial Research, 498(12), 1–19.
[8] Ren, L. (2009). Low-carbon economy and the sustainable development of China’s economy. Social Scientist, 2(2).
[9] Wang, Y., Hou, L., & Zhu, J. (2022). Can urban innovation promote low-carbon economic development? Impact evaluation and mechanism analysis of the Innovative City Pilot policy on carbon intensity. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 39(18), 39–49.
[10] While, A., & Eadson, W. (2022). Zero carbon as economic restructuring: Spatial divisions of labour and just transition. New Political Economy, 27(3), 385–402.
[11] Wu, G., & Duan, Y. (2025). On the hyper-circular economy: Similarities and differences among ecological, circular, low-carbon and green economies. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 35(1), 5–10.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Xinyue Mao