Keywords
Abstract
This paper examines how the distinct regional dynamics of the Cold War era continue to play the most important role in defining the present foreign policy decisions of ASEAN member nations. The essay draws on a comparative case study analysis of the Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam to demonstrate the various historical trajectories that have led to a convergent strategy of "hedging" in the face of modern Sino-American strategic conflict. The Philippines, a historic US ally, shows a pattern of oscillation between alignment and autonomy. Malaysia shows a consistent approach to non-alignment and careful balance. Vietnam, a former member of the Eastern Bloc, has been effective in promoting international integration and reconciliation. The analysis contends that, despite their divergent Cold War experiences, all three states now use the ASEAN platform as an essential framework for presenting a unified front on shared regional challenges, particularly the South China Sea disputes, and engaging major powers through multilateral dialogue and consensus-building. The conclusion proposes that the Cold War's legacy provides the necessary historical backdrop for understanding modern Southeast Asian state behavior, while ASEAN serves as the institutional vehicle for converting this historical experience into effective diplomatic practice.
References
[1] Acharya, A. (2003). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Asian security practice: Material and ideational influences (pp. 199–220). Stanford University Press.
[2] Ciorciari, J. D. (2019). The limits of alignment: Southeast Asia and the great powers since 1975. Georgetown University Press.
[3] Emmers, R. (2006). Southeast Asian security in the new millennium: In search of a regional order. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 28(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1355/CS28-1A
[4] Ha, H. T. (2019). ASEAN’s balancing act: Navigating US-China competition. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
[5] Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. (2012). Southeast Asia and the new international relations of Asia-Pacific. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[6] Lee, J., & Tang, S. M. (2014). Southeast Asia and the rise of China: The search for security. Routledge.
[7] Liow, J. C. (2005). The politics of Indonesia-Malaysia relations: One kin, two nations. Routledge.
[8] Mauzy, D. K. (2000). ASEAN’s Cold War legacy: Southeast Asia’s search for a community of nations. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 27(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927670009598839
[9] Snyder, S. (2010). Revisiting Cold War history: The United States and the creation of ASEAN. Diplomatic History, 34(5), 823–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2010.00897.x
[10] Storey, I. (2021). Southeast Asia and the rise of China: The search for security. Routledge.
[11] Thayer, C. A. (2010). Vietnam: People, politics, and prospects. Routledge.
[12] Thayer, C. A. (2020). The United States, China, and Southeast Asia. Routledge.
[13] Womack, B. (2006). China and Vietnam: The politics of asymmetry. Cambridge University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jiaxi Wu