Policy Intelligence in Urban Ecology: Framework Analysis for Ecosystem Service Integration in Future City Planning
PDF

Keywords

policy intelligence, ecosystem services, urban planning, sustainable cities, framework analysis

Abstract

Purpose: This study develops and applies a comprehensive policy intelligence framework to assess ecosystem service integration effectiveness in urban planning, addressing the need for systematic evaluation approaches that enhance sustainable city development outcomes. Methodology: The research employs a three-dimensional assessment model encompassing information intelligence, goal-setting intelligence, and implementation intelligence dimensions. A qualitative policy document analysis methodology examines Melbourne’s “Nature in the City” strategy as a comprehensive case study to demonstrate framework application and validation. Findings: Findings indicate that Melbourne’s plan is good at collecting basic information and producing a clear strategy. It performs better in mapping ecosystem services and determining how to engage stakeholders. There are huge data analysis gaps, target measures, and adaptive management gaps, though. There are particular failures in predicting outcomes and measuring performance numerically. Conclusion: The policy intelligence frame effectively identifies some performance gaps in various areas. It provides useful recommendations for enhancing policies beyond general planning assessments. In order to effectively include ecosystem services, all components of intelligence need to be enhanced together rather than individually. Practical Implications: The frame provides urban planners and policymakers with a clear mechanism to develop more intelligent and adaptable means to incorporate ecosystem services. It facilitates the development of strong and sustainable urban futures by creating better policies and coordinating implementation.

https://doi.org/10.63808/ihf.v1i3.153
PDF

References

[1] Hawken, S., et al., The SDGs, ecosystem services and cities: a network analysis of current research innovation for implementing urban sustainability. Sustainability, 2021. 13(24): p. 14057.

[2] Wang, M., C. Sun, and D. Zhang, Opportunities and challenges in green stormwater infrastructure (GSI): A comprehensive and bibliometric review of ecosystem services from 2000 to 2021. Environmental Research, 2023. 236: p. 116701.

[3] Cárdenas-Mamani, Ú. and D. Perrotti, Understanding the contribution of ecosystem services to urban metabolism assessments: An integrated framework. Ecological Indicators, 2022. 136: p. 108593.

[4] de Luca, C., et al., Nature-based solutions and sustainable urban planning in the European environmental policy framework: Analysis of the state of the art and recommendations for future development. Sustainability, 2021. 13(9): p. 5021.

[5] Anwar, M.R. and L.D. Sakti, Integrating artificial intelligence and environmental science for sustainable urban planning. IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), 2024. 5(2): p. 179-191.

[6] Lak, A., et al., Towards a framework for driving sustainable urban regeneration with ecosystem services. Land use policy, 2021. 111: p. 105736.

[7] Guo, X., et al., How does ecological protection redline policy affect regional land use and ecosystem services? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2023. 100: p. 107062.

[8] Bibri, S.E., et al., The synergistic interplay of artificial intelligence and digital twin in environmentally planning sustainable smart cities: A comprehensive systematic review. Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2024: p. 100433.

[9] Bibri, S.E., J. Huang, and J. Krogstie, Artificial intelligence of things for synergizing smarter eco-city brain, metabolism, and platform: Pioneering data-driven environmental governance. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024. 108: p. 105516.

[10] Bindajam, A.A., et al., Integration of artificial intelligence-based LULC mapping and prediction for estimating ecosystem services for urban sustainability: past to future perspective. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021. 14: p. 1-23.

[11] Bibri, S.E., Data-driven smart eco-cities of the future: an empirically informed integrated model for strategic sustainable urban development. World Futures, 2023. 79(7-8): p. 703-746.

[12] Yin, X., et al., Artificial intelligence assisted intelligent planning framework for environmental restoration of terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2021. 86: p. 106493.

[13] Bibri, S.E., Data-driven smart sustainable cities of the future: Urban computing and intelligence for strategic, short-term, and joined-up planning. Computational Urban Science, 2021. 1(1): p. 8.

[14] Zhang, Y., et al., Exploring the impact of integrated spatial function zones on land use dynamics and ecosystem services tradeoffs based on a future land use simulation model. Ecological Indicators, 2023. 150: p. 110246.

[15] Nazer, N., K. Chithra, and P. Bimal, Framework for the application of ecosystem services based urban ecological carrying capacity assessment in the urban decision-making process. Environmental Challenges, 2023. 13: p. 100745.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Yifeng Huang