Flood Risk Management Driven by Naturebased Solutions: From Watershed Ecosystem Services to Resilience Enhancement under Climate Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63808/gep.v2i1.295Keywords:
Nature-based solutions, Flood risk management, Watershed, Ecosystem services, Floodplain reconnection, Wetlands, Urban blue-green infrastructure, Coastal protection, Climate adaptation, Resilience, Ecosystem accounting, GEPAbstract
Climate warming is increasing levels of flood risk worldwide because it increases heavy precipitation, runoff and floodplain encroaching accelerates land use change, and concentrates people and assets in flood prone areas. Due to the creation of nonstationary hazard regimes due to the process of climate change, flood governance can no longer be based only on the statistics of events in the past or predetermined design criteria. Traditional grey-only techniques of flood control, such as levees, channelization and hard shorelines structures can provide temporary risk alleviation, but frequently take a toll on river structure, decouple floodplains, shift risk along stream or through time and can lock societies into unbending infrastructural courses that can destroy ecosystems and reduce adaptive capacity.
As proposed by the IUCN and gaining growing root in the UN policy processes, as well as regional level policy, Nature-based Solutions (NbS) demonstrate another avenue of flood risk management, which consists in protecting, restoring or sustainably managing ecosystems to sustain societal needs and deliver ecosystem services, biodiversity benefits and co-benefits to human well-being. In a synthesis of NbS-based flood risk management synthesized in a watershed-to-resilience perspective, this paper integrates (i) hydrological and ecological processes operating, respectively, along the catchment continuum (headwaters to river corridors to floodplains to deltas/coasts to urban systems), (ii) watershed risk-reduction pathways, which operate on hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, and (iii) assessment approaches, which convert ecosystem service delivery into decision-relevant measures, such as ecosystem accounting frameworks (e.g On the whole, the evidence suggests that NbS can offset flooding and improve resilience, yet the influence depends on conditions and may be insignificant in extreme cases; thus, hybrid green-grey portfolios, stress testing at scenarios under non-stationary conditions, and strict monitoring are needed to match the implementation with the Sendai Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction and the IUCN Global Standard on NbS.
References
[1] Acreman, M., & Holden, J. (2013). How wetlands affect floods. Wetlands, *33*(5), 773–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-013-0473-2
[2] Dadson, S. J., Hall, J. W., Murgatroyd, A., Acreman, M., Bates, P., Beven, K., Heathwaite, L., Holden, J., Holman, I. P., Lane, S. N., O’Connell, E., Penning-Rowsell, E., Reynard, N., Sear, D., Thorne, C., & Wilby, R. (2017). A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, *473*(2199), 20160706. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706
[3] Debele, S. E., Kumar, P., Sahani, J., Martí, P., & Zadeh, S. M. (2019). Nature-based solutions for hydrometeorological hazards: Revised concepts, classification schemes and databases. Environmental Research, *179*(Part B), 108799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108799
[4] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
[5] International Union for Conservation of Nature. (2020). IUCN global standard for nature-based solutions: A user-friendly framework for the verification, design and scaling up of NbS (1st ed.). IUCN. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.08.en
[6] Menéndez, P., Losada, I. J., Torres-Ortega, S., Narayan, S., & Beck, M. W. (2020). The global flood protection benefits of mangroves. Scientific Reports, *10*(1), 4404. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61136-6
[7] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
[8] Narayan, S., Beck, M. W., Reguero, B. G., Losada, I. J., van Wesenbeeck, B., Pontee, N., Sanchirico, J. N., Ingram, J. C., Lange, G.-M., & Burks-Copes, K. A. (2016). The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based defences. PLOS ONE, *11*(5), e0154735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154735
[9] Opperman, J. J., Luster, R., McKenney, B. A., Roberts, M., & Meadows, A. W. (2010). Ecologically functional floodplains: Connectivity, flow regime, and scale. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, *46*(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00426.x
[10] Ruangpan, L., Vojinovic, Z., Di Sabatino, S., Leo, L. S., Capobianco, V., Oen, A. M. P., McClain, M. E., & Lopez-Gunn, E. (2020). Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction: A state-of-the-art review of the research area. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, *20*(1), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-243-2020
[11] Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020). Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, *375*(1794), 20190120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
[12] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030
[13] United Nations Statistics Division. (2021). System of environmental-economic accounting—Ecosystem accounting (SEEA EA). United Nations. https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mi Yu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.