Keywords
Abstract
In the governance of multilingual nations, language policies are not only about cultural heritage and social equality but also profoundly influence the construction of national identity and political order. This paper uses securitization theory as an analytical framework to systematically explore the development and evolution of India’s language policies and their deep-seated connection with national identity. Through an analysis of constitutional texts, policy practices, and social movements, it highlights how the Indian government has politicized issues of linguistic diversity through securitization discourse, thereby elevating Hindi to a central position in national identity. In this process, the rights claim of marginalized language groups are often stigmatized, and language conflicts repeatedly escalate into crises of national identity. This paper argues that while language securitization policies have certain functions in national integration, their exclusionary characteristics also exacerbate dissatisfaction and resistance among local cultures, which is detrimental to the long-term stability and harmony of India’s multi-ethnic nation-state. Therefore, future language policies should shift from power-driven approaches to multi-stakeholder governance, establishing an inclusive national identity framework that acknowledges linguistic diversity.
References
[1] Ang, J. B. (2020). Early state institutions and the persistence of linguistic diversity. European Journal of Political Economy, 65, 101914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101914
[2] Bose, K., Basu, A., Majumder, P. P., & Agrawal, S. (2021). Integrating linguistics, social structure, and geography to model genetic diversity within India. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 38(5), 1809–1819. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa321
[3] Cooper, C. A., & Turgeon, L. (2024). Linguistic diversity and public servants’ turnover intentions: Theory and analysis from a multilingual state. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X241271275
[4] de Hoop, E., & Arora, S. (2020). How policy marginalizes diversity: Politics of knowledge in India’s biodiesel promotion. Science as Culture, 30(4), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2020.1820473
[5] Groff, C., Zwart, J., & van der Wildt, A. (2023). Language diversity as resource or as problem? Educator discourses and language policy at high schools in the Netherlands. International Multilingual Research Journal, 17(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2022.2162761
[6] Jiménez, A., & Bayraktar, S. (2021). Hello! Namaste? Within-country linguistic diversity and infrastructure projects in emerging markets. Journal of Business Research, 131, 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.063
[7] Lacerenza, C. N., Marlow, S. L., Traylor, A. M., & Dennerlein, J. T. (2025). Team diversity as a safety asset: A field investigation of language diversity and occupational safety. Human Resource Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22280
[8] Shoham, A., Lee, S. M., & Kang, J. (2024). The interrelationships between corporate political activity and corporate environmental performance: The role of language diversity. Journal of International Business Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00728-0
[9] Van Raemdonck, N., Marinus, K., & Sierens, S. (2024). Navigating linguistic diversity: Teachers’ beliefs on multilingual pedagogies in monolingual policy schools. Language and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2024.2379477
[10] Wright, H. (2024). Diversity of thought as ‘mission critical’: Knowledge, politics and power in UK national security policymaking. Security Dialogue. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106241262855
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Le Wei