Coordinating Across “One Country, Two Systems”: A Case Study of Governance Mechanisms in the 15th National Games

Coordinating Across “One Country, Two Systems”: A Case Study of Governance Mechanisms in the 15th National Games

Authors

  • Ming Kiu Chester Lee School of Physical Education, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • Wenrui Shi School of Physical Education, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63808/gdd.v2i1.436

Keywords:

“One Country, Two Systems”, Cross-System Coordination, Collaborative governance, Mega-sporting events, 15th National Games of China, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

Abstract

The 15th National Games of the People’s Republic of China, jointly hosted by Guangdong Province, Hong Kong, and Macao in November 2025, represents the first instance in which multiple provincial-level administrative regions co-hosted a National Games under the “one country, two systems” framework. This study asks how cross-system coordination governance mechanisms emerged in such an institutionally asymmetric setting, and what characteristics they exhibited across organizational, regulatory, and resource dimensions. Drawing on collaborative governance theory, the study applies directed content analysis to 47 official policy documents issued between August 2021 and November 2025, yielding 558 coded provisions. The findings identify a governance model best characterized as centrally coordinated, jurisdictionally differentiated, and operationally interconnected. The “1+4” liaison mechanism, the “pre-verification plus closed-loop management” customs model, and an asymmetric resource distribution with Guangdong as the core host and Hong Kong and Macao as specialized nodes constitute the core innovations. The findings extend collaborative governance theory into cross-jurisdictional institutional settings and offer practical implications for future Greater Bay Area cooperation.

References

[1] Bauer, Z., AbouAssi, K., & Johnston, J. M. (2023). Governance arrangements of cross-sector collaboration and its effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(2), 346–369.

[2] Cheng, E. W., & Tong, K. L. (2025). Variegated city-region governance: Centralised design, localised implementation and asymmetric integration in China’s Greater Bay Area. Territory, Politics, Governance, 13(5), 716–736.

[3] Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 717–747.

[4] Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.

[5] Lee Ludvigsen, J. A., Rookwood, J., & Parnell, D. (2022). The sport mega-events of the 2020s: Governance, impacts and controversies. Sport in Society, 25(4), 705–711.

[6] Lin, Z., Yang, Z., Lam, J. F., & Li, L. (2024). Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao cooperation: Historical process and driving mechanisms. Social Sciences, 13(6), 297.

[7] Liu, Z., Qiu, Y., & Ma, Y. (2025). Fighting COVID-19 in China’s Greater Bay Area: How do different policy styles affect policy effectiveness? Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1654076.

[8] Wang, C., Ye, Y., & Huang, Z. (2024). Synergistic development in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area: Index measurement and systematic evaluation based on industry–innovation–infrastructure–institution perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140093.

[9] Wong, N. W. (2018). Electronic waste governance under “one country, two systems”: Hong Kong and mainland China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(11), 2347.

[10] Xie, X., Liu, X., & McNay, I. (2023). One country with two systems: The characteristics and development of higher education in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01483-z

[11] Yang, J. (2022). Economic synergistic development of Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area urban agglomeration: Based on composite system. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022(1), 7677188.

[12] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

[13] Yoon, N., Fields, K., Cochran, B., & Nabatchi, T. (2022). Collaborative governance at scale: Examining the regimes, platforms, and system in the State of Oregon. The American Review of Public Administration, 52(6), 439–456.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-25
Loading...