Research on Solving Low Ride Comfort and Strong Dizziness in New Energy Vehicles through Physics and Mathematics Methods

Research on Solving Low Ride Comfort and Strong Dizziness in New Energy Vehicles through Physics and Mathematics Methods

Authors

  • Yicheng Tang Wuhan Britain-China School, Wuhan 430000, China.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63808/aepm.v1i2.258

Keywords:

electric vehicles; ride comfort; motion sickness; vehicle dynamics modeling; multi-objective optimization

Abstract

Electric cars have extreme passenger experience problems with reduced ride comfort and increased motion sickness occurrences to 34% due to instantaneous torque and intensive regenerative brakes with high jerk magnitudes compared to 14% in traditional cars. In this study, a novel framework combining seven degrees-of-freedom dynamics and mathematical modeling of vestibular system reaction is proposed to conclude that jerk is a key factor in explaining motion sickness variability for 42%, and peak jerk in electric cars is higher than in traditional cars for 81%. The multi-objective optimization technique using NSGA-III genetic algorithms shows that parameters can be tuned to alleviate vibration experience and motion sickness index for 25% and 31%, respectively, with a negligible power performance penalty of 3.8% in return. Experimental testing on 50 subjects shows that this novel technology can significantly decrease motion sickness occurrence by 65% at a cost of 310 yuan per car to achieve engineering feasibility for industrialization and fill critical challenges in popularization of electromobility.

References

[1] Gheibollahi, H., & Masih-Tehrani, M. (2023). A multi-objective optimization method based on NSGA-II algorithm and entropy weighted TOPSIS for fuzzy active seat suspension of articulated truck semi-trailer. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 237(17), 3809–3826. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062231151799

[2] Hwang, M. H., Lee, G. S., Kim, E., Kim, H. W., Yoon, S., Talluri, T., & Cha, H. R. (2023). Regenerative braking control strategy based on AI algorithm to improve driving comfort of autonomous vehicles. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020946

[3] Jin, Z., Li, X., & Cao, S. (2025). Multi-objective parameter optimization of electro-hydraulic energy-regenerative suspension systems for urban buses. Machines, 13(6), 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13060488

[4] Kotian, V., Irmak, T., Pool, D., & Happee, R. (2024). The role of vision in sensory integration models for predicting motion perception and sickness. Experimental Brain Research, 242(3), 685–725.

[5] Krishna, K., Hegde, S., Mahesha, G. T., & Shenoy, S. B. (2024). Enhancement of rider comfort by magnetorheological elastomer based damping treatment at strategic locations of an electric two wheeler. Scientific Reports, 14, 20107.

[6] Li, W., Xu, H., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Lin, X., Wang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Regenerative braking control strategy for pure electric vehicles based on fuzzy neural network. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(2), 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102430

[7] Masri, J., Amer, M., Salman, S., Ismail, M., & Elsisi, M. (2024). A survey of modern vehicle noise, vibration, and harshness: A state-of-the-art. Automotive Science and Engineering Journal, 15(10), 102957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102957

[8] Qu, Z., Zhang, P., Hu, Y., Yang, H., Guo, T., Zhang, K., & Zhang, J. (2023). Optimal design of agricultural mobile robot suspension system based on NSGA-III and TOPSIS. Agriculture, 13(1), 188.

[9] Quintana, A., Mancilla-Medina, P., Sánchez, E., Sánchez-Brualla, L., Galera, M., Portell, E., & Rico, E. P. (2023). Vestibular CCK signaling drives motion sickness–like behavior in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(44), e2304933120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2304933120

[10] Tang, B., Luo, B., Ding, Y., Tang, Q., & Wu, Y. (2025). Investigating the impact of different road scenarios on the induction intensity of motion sickness in electric vehicle passengers. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1615498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1615498

[11] Wolter, S., Rausch, J. R., Engelke, M. J., & Hennes, N. (2025). Evaluation of carsickness countermeasures in a test track study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 109, 104548.

[12] Yang, C., Sun, T., Wang, W., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zha, M. (2024). Regenerative braking system development and perspectives for electric vehicles: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 198, 114428.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-21
Loading...